Image via Wikipedia
Twitter, Facebook, and social activism : The New Yorker.
This is an article written by Malcolm Gladwell of The New Yorker called, “Small Change: Why the Revolution Will Not Be Tweeted”. This is interesting because I have often thought, as I shared something on my Facebook or even through this blog, of how diluted individual causes and passions have become on the net. It is very hard to sift through EVERY cause that EVERY friend is concerned with. We spread ourselves too thin because signing that petition is one click away. I don’t even remember all the petitions I signed. I meant it at the moment though. Give this article a read and leave some comments, opinions, or thoughts!!
Related Articles
- If the revolution is tweeted it’ll probably get lost in a sea of tweets about Justin Beiber (broadstuff.com)
- Sorry, Malcolm Gladwell, the revolution may well be tweeted [Voices] (voices.allthingsd.com)
- Tipping Point Author Malcolm Gladwell Says Facebook, Twitter Won’t Lead to Social Change (readwriteweb.com)
- Four Ways Social Media Is Redefining Activism (psychologytoday.com)
- Twitter and Facebook cannot change the real world, says Malcolm Gladwell (guardian.co.uk)
- Malcolm Gladwell Really Gets Social Networking Wrong (oliverwillis.com)
- Social Media and Social Activism: Four Reasons Why Malcolm Gladwell is Wrong (gauravonomics.com)
- Has Malcolm Gladwell been reading Dietrich Bonhoeffer? (blakehuggins.com)
- Malcolm Gladwell’s new New Yorker Piece (currentbuzz.org)
- Is digital activism an effective medium for change? | Jaz Cummins (guardian.co.uk)
- Malcolm Gladwell, Bill Maher: We Don’t Care What Bloggers Have to Say (blogher.com)
