Full Article at above link.
Since it was passed almost a decade ago, some of the most noxious portions of the PATRIOT Act have burrowed their way deep into our legal system. A year ago, President Obama signed a bill extending three provisions of the original PATRIOT Act; last week Congressman Mike Rogers (R-Michigan) introduced legislation to extend them again.
Barack Obama’s justice department has come out in favor of renewing three controversial PATRIOT Act provisions. The silver lining? Tthe Justice Department also declares its openness to “modifications” of those provisions designed to provide checks and balances, provided they don’t undermine investigations. The problem with many of the law’s provisions is that there are needed constraints and oversight mechanisms.
Three of the Potential Changes That Can Be Made:
Consider the much-contested “roving wiretap” provision allowing warrants under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act to cover all the communications devices a target might use without specifying the facilities to be monitored in advance—at least in cases where there are specific facts supporting the belief that a target is likely to take measures to thwart traditional surveillance. The objection to this provision is not that intelligence officers should never be allowed to obtain roving warrants, which also exist in the law governing ordinary law enforcement wiretaps. The issue is that FISA is fairly loosey-goosey about the specification of “targets”—they can be described rather than identified. That flexibility may make some sense in the foreign intel context, but when you combine it with similar flexibility in the specification of the facility to be monitored, you get something that looks a heck of a lot like a general warrant. It’s one thing to say “we have evidence this particular phone line and e-mail account are being used by terrorists, though we don’t know who they are” or “we have evidence this person is a terrorist, but he keeps changing phones.” It’s another—and should not be possible—to mock traditional particularity requirements by obtaining a warrant to tap someone on some line, to be determined. FISA warrants should “rove” over persons or facilities, but never both.
The DOJ letter describes the so-called “Lone Wolf” amendment to FISA as simply allowing surveillance of targets who are agents of foreign powers without having identified which foreign power (i.e. which particular terrorist group) they’re working for. They say they’ve never invoked this ability, but want to keep it in reserve. If that description were accurate, I’d say let them. But as currently written, the “lone wolf” language potentially covers people who are really conventional domestic threats with only the most tenuous international ties—the DOJ letter alludes to people who “self-radicalize” by reading online propaganda, but are not actually agents of a foreign group at all.
Finally, there’s the “business records” provision, which actually covers the seizure of any “tangible thing.” The problems with this one probably deserve their own post, and ideally you’d just go through the ordinary warrant procedure for this. But at the very, very least there should be some more specific nexus to a particular foreign target than “relevance” to a ongoing investigation before an order issues. The gag orders that automatically accompany these document requests also require more robust judicial scrutiny.
The link above will take you to Demand Progress and there is an option to sign their petition.
- David Segal: Who Knew? PATRIOT Act up for Renewal This Month (huffingtonpost.com)
- Obama to renew Patriot Act. (politics.ie)
- Congress, Once Again, Looks To Extend Patriot Act With Little Or No Debate (techdirt.com)
- Congress Prepares To Extend Patriot Act Again, With No Real Opposition (crooksandliars.com)
- Congress quietly prepares to renew Patriot Act (notalemming.wordpress.com)
- Ex CIA Official: Patriot Act Like Nazi Laws (grantlawrence.blogspot.com)
- We’re Conflating Proper Dissent and Terrorism (musicians4freedom.com)
- Defenders of civil liberties look for a new champion to replace Russ Feingold. (slate.com)
- Patriot Act Up For Renewal, Nobody Notices (news.slashdot.org)